On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: >> 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: >> > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: >> >> > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have >> > _multiple_ NVS regions. That really helped, thanks a lot. >> >> Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? >> It seems to help with suspending to disk. > > No, that doesn't matter. NVS regions are just sitting there regardless of > what happens at run time. Strange. If I didn't offline, it hanged during suspend even without thinkpad_acpi. I could see that the suspend code does the offline automatically, but executing the offline before calling suspend makes it no hanging. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
