Re: on builds/randconfigs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/11 10:35, Len Brown wrote:
>>> While I agree that randconfig build testing
>>> is theoretically useful, in recent memory
>>> its results do not seem particularly relevant
>>> to useful configs.
>>
>> Who defines useful?
> 
> Simple.
> 
> Configs that will be used are useful.

Then I suggest that you start deleting non-useful kernel configs.
You can begin in ACPI.

-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux