On Thursday, January 06, 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 04:57 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 06, 2011, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> When ioremap fails (which might happen for some reason),
> >
> > If it happens, something is seriously wrong (see below).
>
> I agree that something is broken, however ioremap may fail for dozen of
> reasons. Ignoring the retval is a *bad* idea and it took me a while to
> sort out what is wrong. Especially if one has no console like throughout
> suspend. If it was handled properly, I would know immediately. (There
> should be a message printed out which I forgot to add.)
It wasn't handled, because it _never_ failed previously. The ACPI mapping
change apparently revealed a deeper problem.
I'm not saying the patch isn't useful, though, and I'm going to take it
for 2.6.38 (perhaps with minor modifications).
> > BTW, to keep things in context, please post fixes like this in the same thread
> > in which you reported the problem. At lease please retain the CC list from
> > there.
>
> I actually did, there is:
> In-Reply-To: <201101060028.43342.rjw@xxxxxxx>
> and it successfully threaded to the conversation for me in TB.
But you trimmed the CC line, didn't you? Which caused my filter to put the
patch into a different folder. :-)
> >> we nicely oops in suspend_nvs_save due to NULL dereference by memcpy in
> >> there. Fail gracefully instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 ++---
> >> include/linux/suspend.h | 4 ++--
> >> kernel/power/nvs.c | 8 +++++++-
> >> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >> index c423231..f94c9a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >> @@ -124,8 +124,7 @@ static int acpi_pm_freeze(void)
> >> static int acpi_pm_pre_suspend(void)
> >> {
> >> acpi_pm_freeze();
> >> - suspend_nvs_save();
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return suspend_nvs_save();
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> @@ -151,7 +150,7 @@ static int acpi_pm_prepare(void)
> >> {
> >> int error = __acpi_pm_prepare();
> >> if (!error)
> >> - acpi_pm_pre_suspend();
> >> + error = acpi_pm_pre_suspend();
> >>
> >> return error;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
> >> index c1f4998..3ac2551 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/suspend.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
> >> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline bool system_entering_hibernation(void) { return false; }
> >> extern int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long start, unsigned long size);
> >> extern int suspend_nvs_alloc(void);
> >> extern void suspend_nvs_free(void);
> >> -extern void suspend_nvs_save(void);
> >> +extern int suspend_nvs_save(void);
> >> extern void suspend_nvs_restore(void);
> >> #else /* CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS */
> >> static inline int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> >> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static inline int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> >> }
> >> static inline int suspend_nvs_alloc(void) { return 0; }
> >> static inline void suspend_nvs_free(void) {}
> >> -static inline void suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >> +static inline int suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >> static inline void suspend_nvs_restore(void) {}
> >> #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS */
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/power/nvs.c b/kernel/power/nvs.c
> >> index 1836db6..57c6fab 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/power/nvs.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/power/nvs.c
> >> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int suspend_nvs_alloc(void)
> >> /**
> >> * suspend_nvs_save - save NVS memory regions
> >> */
> >> -void suspend_nvs_save(void)
> >> +int suspend_nvs_save(void)
> >> {
> >> struct nvs_page *entry;
> >>
> >> @@ -114,8 +114,14 @@ void suspend_nvs_save(void)
> >> list_for_each_entry(entry, &nvs_list, node)
> >> if (entry->data) {
> >> entry->kaddr = ioremap(entry->phys_start, entry->size);
> >
> > I wonder what happens if you simply change the ioremap() here to
> > ioremap_nocache() without any other modifications?
>
> ioremap *is* ioremap_nocache on x86. And that's the conflict it
> complains about I guess? Don't you mean ioremap_cache?
Yes, I meant ioremap_cache(), sorry. Using ioremap_cache() here fixes the
problem for Len (he's seeing the same issue on his test machine).
The question is why it helps, though. My theory is that we have mapped the
same area already using ioremap_cache() and now we're trying to map it again
using ioremap_nocache(), hence the conflict. I need to confirm this.
> > It _really_ shouldn't fail here, because the NVS pages are known to be present.
>
> It fails because of conflicting maps as can be seen in the photo. At
> least I think so.
Yes, I think so too. Which is _suspicious_.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
