On Monday, January 03, 2011, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:23:42PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > As I've already said on IRC, I'd simply add a new function like:
> >
> > void acpi_battery_refresh(struct acpi_battery *battery)
> > {
> > if (!battery->bat.dev)
> > return;
> > acpi_battery_get_info(battery);
> > /* The battery may have changed its reporting units */
> > sysfs_remove_battery(battery);
> > sysfs_add_battery(battery);
> > }
> >
> > and call it before acpi_battery_update()
> > (a) in acpi_battery_resume()
> > (b) in acpi_battery_notify() if event == ACPI_BATTERY_NOTIFY_INFO
> >
> > That would be more straightforward IMHO.
>
> That might be more reasonable. Want to send that, or shall I?
I can do that.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
