On Thursday, December 16, 2010 02:59:33 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > So I think the best band-aid for now is to revert to bottom-up allocation
> > and do a better job of avoiding E820 reserved areas. Obviously, it's not
> > complete because we could still trip over ACPI devices (as in 23802), but
> > that's a problem we've always had and it's not as likely if we go bottom-up.
>
> Ok, ack for this series. Have we got testers for it? In particular,
> have the people who have seen regressions been notified of this new
> series?
I put the patches in these bugzillas:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 (Dell T3500)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23132 (Dell 1545)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23542 (HP 2530p)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23802 (PCI / TPM conflict)
Bernard Wiedemann reported success for 16228 on a Dell T3500. No
news yet on the others.
For this one:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23332 (HP nx6325)
I have an nx6325 and tested it myself.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
