On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:59:33 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So I think the best band-aid for now is to revert to bottom-up allocation > > and do a better job of avoiding E820 reserved areas. ÂObviously, it's not > > complete because we could still trip over ACPI devices (as in 23802), but > > that's a problem we've always had and it's not as likely if we go bottom-up. > > Ok, ack for this series. Have we got testers for it? In particular, > have the people who have seen regressions been notified of this new > series? > > That said, let's just try to merge it quickly so that we get maximal > coverage before the holiday season starts. Jesse, it makes sense > through your tree, but if you'd rather me take it directly, I can do > that. I'll pull it into my tree and send you a pull req tomorrow if that's ok. I have a couple of fixes besides this, but I have to drop Bjorn's earlier series... Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
