On 12/14/2010 06:27 PM, Jack Steiner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 02:58:42PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 12/14/2010 02:09 PM, Jack Steiner wrote: >>> Map ACPI tables as WB on x86_64. No substantive changes to IA64. >> >> Why just x86-64? > > We never observed a performance problem on IA64. Not sure if it maps > ACPI space as WB or not. Since I did not have easy access to > an ia64, I chose not to make any changes to the way it maps > the table. > You're missing the point: x86-64 as opposed to x86 in general. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
