On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll add Dan and Rafael's tested-bys to the patches (they're
> already in my for-linus tree). Unless Linus has a problem with them
> I'll send them over to him this weekend or Monday.
See my other email I just sent out.
I really am not going to take some totally new experimental and hacky
major PCI resource management thing this late in the -rc game. No way,
no how.
If the top-down allocator is causing regressions that cannot be fixed
by _simple_ patches, we're simply going to have to undo it. What's the
advantage of top-down? None. Not if we then need all this crap, which
we could as easily do on top of the bottom-up one WITHOUT any
regressions.
Why isn't anybody else questioning the whole basic premise here?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
