Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PM: Blacklist another machine that needs acpi_sleep=nonvs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:14:42PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > Rather than a black list of machines that can not survive saving NVS,
> > I wonder how long a white list of machines requiring NVS save would be?
> 
> Windows saves the NVS area in my testing. Either there's something that 
> indicates the choices of one behaviour over the other, or the machines 
> that are broken by NVS saving are actually tripping some other bug.

Since we're claiming Windows compatibility through _OSI, we should follow
Windows except for on machines that are blacklisted as not being
Windows-compatible.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux