On Thursday, October 07, 2010, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Sameer Nanda wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:43:34AM -0700, Sameer Nanda wrote: > > >> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > And are you always going to be printing this out? Why do we want to > > >> > know this every time? > > >> > > > >> > > >> Yes, every time. This helps track variance in BIOS resume times within a > > >> single boot. > > > > > > Is that really something that users can do something about? > > > > Aside from complaining to the BIOS vendors, no :) > > Then I would not recommend adding this patch, as it is irrelevant for > 99.9999% of all Linux users. It may be somewhat useful, but the rdtscll() call seems to be x86-specific, in which case it shouldn't be used at this place. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html