Re: Toshiba C650-194 ACPI bug - regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glad to help Len.

BTW, what is going on here? Is there a thread where this is explained?
Seems the BIOS deliberately alters the DSDT after initialisation. Do
we know why? Does it do it for Win OSs?

Also, I see that for kernels >= 2.6.35 the boot argument
acpi=copy_dsdt is available which it sounds like it should cause the
same behaviour as this patch. Is that right? In which case I can start
to use that with standard distros once the appropriate kernel level is
distributed for Ubuntu.

Many thanks, al.

On 2 October 2010 03:45, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for confirming the patch works, Allan,
>
> It shipped upstream in 2.6.36-rc6-git2
> and I just sent a note for Greg to consider it for .stable
>
> cheers,
> Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux