On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:00:24 +0100 Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Section 4.7.3.1.1 (PM1 Status Registers) of version 4.0 of > the ACPI spec concerning PCIEXP_WAKE_STS points out in > in the final note field in table 4-11 that if this bit is > set to 1 and the system is put into a sleeping state then > the system will not automatically wake. > > This bit gets set by hardware to indicate that the system > woke up due to a PCI Express wakeup event, so clear it during > acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status() calls to enable subsequent > resumes to work. > > BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613381 > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h > index 147a7e6..f26db38 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h > @@ -853,6 +853,7 @@ struct acpi_bit_register_info { > ACPI_BITMASK_POWER_BUTTON_STATUS | \ > ACPI_BITMASK_SLEEP_BUTTON_STATUS | \ > ACPI_BITMASK_RT_CLOCK_STATUS | \ > + ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE | \ (1) Above should be indented with tabs, not spaces. (2) It should not take 2 emails to send a patch with one line changed. Patch 0/N is unnecessary and not desirable on short patch series (N = 1 is short). > ACPI_BITMASK_WAKE_STATUS) > > #define ACPI_BITMASK_TIMER_ENABLE 0x0001 > -- --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
