On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Jean Sacren wrote: > warning: 'num_cpus' may be used uninitialized in this function > > Initialize 'num_cpus' variable to zero so that gcc doesn't complain. acpi_pad_pur() is referenced only once, so it should end up inlined, at which point gcc really has no excuse to not determine with perfect confidence whether num_cpus is being used unitialized or not. Looking at the code, it realy does look like a false positive. Are you using a recent gcc? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
