On 09/10/2010 04:45 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:20:36 -0700
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/2010 11:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 07:56:59 pm Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When bios switch to use Device object instead of Processor statement.
>>>>
>>>> the SSDT for Pstate/Cstate/Tstate can not be loaded dynamically.
>>>>
>>>> So try to scan ACPI0007 in addition to Processor.
>>>>
>>>> this fix regression: 2.6.32 is ok.
>>>
>>> Can you include the URL of the regression bug report? And maybe
>>> the commit that introduced the regression?
>>
>> the commit should be
>>
>> commit d8191fa4a33fdc817277da4f2b7f771ff605a41c
>> Author: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon Feb 22 12:11:39 2010 -0700
>>
>> ACPI: processor: driver doesn't need to evaluate _PDC
>>
>> Now that the early _PDC evaluation path knows how to correctly
>> evaluate _PDC on only physically present processors, there's no
>> need for the processor driver to evaluate it later when it loads.
>>
>> To cover the hotplug case, push _PDC evaluation down into the
>> hotplug paths.
>>
>> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> that is between 2.6.34-rc1 and 2.6.34-rc2.
>>
>> So we need put this patch in stable tree for 2.6.34, .35, .36
>>
>
> Maybe. But first can you please address Bjorn's suggestions below?
fine, if you prefer 47 lines instead one line changes.
[PATCH -v2] acpi: handle ACPI0007 Device in acpi_early_set_pdc
When bios switch to use Device object instead of Processor statement.
the SSDT for Pstate/Cstate/Tstate can not loaded dynamically.
So try to scan ACPI0007 in addition to Processor.
-v2: add 47 lines instead of 1 line to walk namespace one time only.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 8 ++++---
include/acpi/acpixf.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int acpi_get_cpuid(acpi_handle handle, i
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_cpuid);
#endif
-static bool processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
+static bool is_processor_and_physically_present(acpi_handle handle)
{
int cpuid, type;
u32 acpi_id;
@@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ static bool processor_physically_present
acpi_id = object.processor.proc_id;
break;
case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+ if (acpi_match_device_hid(handle, "ACPI0007") != AE_OK)
+ return false;
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_UID", NULL, &tmp);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return false;
@@ -334,7 +336,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_set_pdc
static acpi_status
early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
{
- if (processor_physically_present(handle) == false)
+ if (is_processor_and_physically_present(handle) == false)
return AE_OK;
acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
@@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc
*/
dmi_check_system(processor_idle_dmi_table);
- acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
+ acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_ANY, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
early_init_pdc, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsxfeval.c
@@ -524,6 +524,49 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_walk_namespace)
/*******************************************************************************
*
+ * FUNCTION: acpi_match_device_hid
+ *
+ * PARAMETERS: handle and HID to be compared
+ *
+ * RETURN: bool
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION: check if device coresponding to handle has HID
+ *
+ ******************************************************************************/
+acpi_status acpi_match_device_hid(acpi_handle obj_handle, const char *HID)
+{
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_namespace_node *node;
+ struct acpica_device_id *hid;
+ int no_match;
+
+ status = acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return status;
+
+ node = acpi_ns_validate_handle(obj_handle);
+ status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return status;
+
+ if (!node)
+ return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+
+ status = acpi_ut_execute_HID(node, &hid);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+ return status;
+
+ no_match = ACPI_STRCMP(hid->string, HID);
+ ACPI_FREE(hid);
+
+ if (no_match)
+ return AE_NOT_FOUND;
+
+ return AE_OK;
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ *
* FUNCTION: acpi_ns_get_device_callback
*
* PARAMETERS: Callback from acpi_get_device
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpixf.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/acpixf.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpixf.h
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ acpi_walk_namespace(acpi_object_type typ
acpi_walk_callback post_order_visit,
void *context, void **return_value);
+acpi_status acpi_match_device_hid(acpi_handle obj_handle, const char *HID);
+
acpi_status
acpi_get_devices(const char *HID,
acpi_walk_callback user_function,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
