Re: acpi_atomic_read() requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, September 03, 2010 03:17:05 am Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Good.  Unless there's a spec requirement for 64-bit accesses in this
> > area, I think it's better to do it the same way as acpi_read(), just
> > so we're as consistent as possible.
> 
> I'm not sure if the spec explicit asks for it, but doing a full
> 64bit access would be in the spirit of it at least.

It would, and I hoped the spec would clarify that, but I didn't
see anything.

If there's a reason to have acpi_atomic_read() work differently
than acpi_read() in this respect, that's fine.  I just don't see
it yet.  If they *can* be made similar in this, I think we might
be able to collapse them into a single, smaller implementation.

> On the other hand I would expect hardware that really requires 64bit
> to be rare because 32bit OS would always have some trouble with
> it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux