On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:04:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'd be suspecting that we have two patches both of which worked > > separately but which broke when combined. Is there some other patch in > > that tree which adds a new reference to `ref' in acpi_power_seq_show()? > > The offending patch isn't about acpi_power_seq_show(), it's about > acpi_power_off_device(). The patch I sent Len patched acpi_power_seq_show(). > > ... > > What does that say about the _rest_ of the patches? Not tested in combination? > What does that say about (lack of) -next testing? That code compiled OK in -mm which includes linux-next. I assume that some last-minute merging broke things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
