Re: [PATCH_v8 1/2] IPMI/ACPI: Define acpi_ipmi notifier hook functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2010 11:52 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Monday, July 26, 2010 08:46:04 am yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Zhao yakui<yakui.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>

This needs a changelog.

This seems like a complicated solution to a simple problem.

I don't understand why the ACPI IPMI opregion stuff can't be made an
optional feature of the ACPI IPMI driver.  Trying to completely decouple
things is just going to add corner cases and weird dependencies.
Well, ipmi_si_intf is pretty darn big as it is. I would like to break it up.

I spent a little time reading the ACPI spec to understand just what the heck this thing is. So now my head hurts a little. But from what I can tell, this provides a way for the ACPI system to specify operations that are done by sending IPMI messages. For instance, if power control was done via IPMI, the various control methods for power control would work their way down the to access to opregion interfaces mapping to IPMI functions, and that's where this piece of code takes over.

If so, this code has nothing to do with the IPMI system interface. It's really more ACPI than IPMI. It's sending messages at the very top of the IPMI stack, where it should. The only reason it cares about ipmi_si at all is the discovery of the IPMI interfaces.

I agree that a notifier framework seems like massive overkill for this interface. I will note that there are already interfaces for registering to receive callbacks when an IPMI device is added or removed. What's missing is a way to ask "Is this an ACPI PNP device?".

Since this same function will be needed for IPMI SMBus interfaces, if that ever becomes a reality in the kernel, it seems more reasonable to provide some type of addition to the IPMI interface to be able to store this in the low-level code and retrieve this from the IPMI user interface. So you can use the standard mechanisms to watch for devices being added, and then query to see if they are PNP at that point.

Does that make sense?

-corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux