On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307 > > Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups > > Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <enban@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (13 days old) > > Message-ID : <4C26317A.5070309@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2 > > I don't think anybody noticed this one. Jesse? Oh I hadn't seen that... Enrico, can you bisect this issue? It could be some spurious hotplug events or possibly a stuck vblank interrupt... > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265 > > Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time? > > Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (30 days old) > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c > > Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4 > > Dave, Jesse? I haven't looked at the switchable graphics stuff, hopefully Dave has an idea here. > Fixed by commit f4985dc714d7. > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228 > > Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine) > > Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <phunge0@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (23 days old) > > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> > > This has a butt-ugly suggested patch that certainly won't be applied. > I saw the thread, but lost sight of it. Jesse, did that end up with > some resolution? I'll follow up with Yinghai, we were pretty clear about what we wanted from that patch. > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16179 > > Subject : 2.6.35-rc2 completely hosed on intel gfx? > > Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@xxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2010-06-06 11:55 (33 days old) > > Message-ID : <20100606115534.GA9399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127582534931581&w=2 > > Hmm. That one is the vt.c bug coupled with another problem, which in > turn got opened as a separate bugzilla entry: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16252 > > which in turn then got closed. I dunno. Yeah, this is weird. Norbert, do you still see this? Have you tried to bisect it? -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
