RE: [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Then be sure to disable the disassembler with an appropriate error message on these architectures.

Note, we now have a data table compiler, you should look at that also.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: malattia@xxxxxxxx [mailto:malattia@xxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 3:08 PM
>To: Moore, Robert
>Cc: Len Brown; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian
>
>On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:27:20PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
>> If you'd like to get ambitious, run the ASLTS suite on the big-endian
>machines.
>
>I'll give it a go :)
>Is the one found in the meego git repository what I should try?
>
>Just one note that probably was not clear from my initial email: the
>patches I sent to support BE architectures are only for compiling asl
>code.
>I'd like to add support for decompiling too eventually.
>
>Thanks!
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: malattia@xxxxxxxx [mailto:malattia@xxxxxxxx]
>> >Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:44 PM
>> >To: Moore, Robert
>> >Cc: Len Brown; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >Subject: [patch 0/5] iASL patches in Debian
>> >
>> >Hi Robert,
>> >
>> >Here is a series of patches that I've been carrying in the iasl Debian
>> >package for some time. They are all refreshed and reworked to apply
>> >cleanly on top of acpica-unix-20100528.
>> >The series consists a couple of trivial patches to fix building on the
>> >FreeBSD and Hurd kernel flavours of Debian and some larger ones to
>enable
>> >compiling ASL on big endian architectures.
>> >It would be great if you could apply the patches to your source tree and
>> >ship new release with this work included.
>> >Let me know if you want me to run more tests or change something in the
>> >patches.
>> >
>> >I tested building tests/misc/grammar.asl (plus a number or other DSDTs I
>> >have here) with the whole set applied and the results were identical on
>> >BE and LE machines as well as being identical to what a clean iasl
>> >produces on x86[1].
>> >You can see build logs for all the architectures supported here:
>> >https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=acpica-unix
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >[1]: checked with (1) an hex dump of the AML file, (2) the C file
>> >generated with -tc and (3) by decompiling the AML to DSL on x86 and
>> >comparing the results.
>> >As a side note pristine iasl on x86 sefaults when building
>> >test/misc/grammar.asl, with these patches applied it doesn't.
>> >
>> >--
>> >mattia
>--
>mattia
>:wq!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux