On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:53:15PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2010-05-28 23:22:16, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Although this is clear violation of ACPI spec. the other OS does that... > > > > So you are adding bugs... what about having them optional, probably > quirk-driven? What's the benefit of having an incomplete quirk table over just doing what the hardware expects? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
