RE: [linux-pm] RFC: /sys/power/policy_preference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

> From:  Len Brown [lenb@xxxxxxxxxx]

policy_preference has 5 levels, from max_performance
through max_powersave.  Here is how 4 parts of the kernel
might respond to those 5 levels:

[levels description]

i do understand that you are mostly targetting acpi based systems, but even there, based on static leaks, it might not be always true that lower frequencies are correlated to higher power savings (or maybe i have misunderstood your draft - i am not so fluent in acpi)

> it is likely
> that some users would want to use "powersave" when on
> battery and perhaps shift to "performance" on A/C.

if we consider also the thermal envelope and the fact that "performance" might steal power from a charging battery, even ton A/C it might not be possible to settle down in one state permanently.

Or do you expect other mechanisms to intervene?

Cheers, igor--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux