On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 21:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, June 11, 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, June 11, 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > Just bisected it. > > > > > > I also tried linux-acpi-next/test, and no change. > > > > > > The sympthoms are that EC does't sent any GPEs, and therefore battery > > > insert/removal events don't show up. > > > > > > It can be see by doing 'grep . /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/*' > > > With regression the line is shown like this: > > > > > > > > > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe1C: 1 enabled > > > > > > Without regression it is > > > > > > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpe1C: 22889 enabled > > > > > > and steadily increasing. > > > > > > After suspend/resume, regression disappears. > > > > Hmm. > > > > Can you please apply the following patches: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104903/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104912/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104909/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104911/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/104910/ > > > > on top of current -git and see if the problem is still there? > > Also, regardless of whether or not this helps, please try to revert only the > changes made by the "guilty" commit in drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c and see > if that helps (this revert will conflict with the patches above, so you'll need > to unapply them before). > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Yes, reverting changes in 'drivers/acpi/acpica/evxface.c' do restore correct behavior. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
