On Sat, 8 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > To calrify, I think the approach in the Matthew's patch is correct, but since I have > some bad experience with that particular thing, I prefer to make that change in > 2.6.35 and then move on to drop the flag entirely. Oh,yes. I'm not suggesting we do it late in the -rc cycle. I just don't think the DMI table is a good idea, so in the longer run I wan tto get rid of it, rather than have it grow (by quite a few entries, in this case). There are valid reasons for DMI tables in many cases, but in this case I think the reason is simply that we do the wrong thing, so then we ended up with a DMI table to "fix" the wrong thing we do. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
