should the resoltion of a closed lid of a docked ThinkPad be considered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

there's a different behaviour between 2.6.33.3 and 2.6.34-rc5 observed at a 
ThinkPad T400 with intel graphic GM45 .

If it is docked and the lid is closed (1440x900) and an external DVI monitor 
(1650x1080) is connected at the docking station - the dmesg of 2.6.33.3 gives:
	Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 210x65
whereas 2.6.34 gives:
	Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 180x56

Furthermore X differs in the fact, that 2.6.33.3 sets the external monitor to 
the expected resolution:
	(II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 using initial mode 1680x1050
whereas 2.6.34-rc5 sets it to the (unwanted) lower resolution :
	(II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 using initial mode 1440x900

Now I'm wondering whether this new behaviour is wanted - and if not - which 
mailing list is the correct one ?

-- 
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster

pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux