Thank's for Kay's comment from udev side. Hi Thomas, 於 四，2010-04-01 於 15:40 +0200，Kay Sievers 提到： > > Currently, there have a bit platform provider (OEM/ODM) only return the > > _HOT, but didn't have _CRT value. But, if _HOT S4 fail, the system > > components might dangerous if there have no any hardware protected > > Mechanism. > > > > Thomas's idea is add a sysfs interface /sys/class/thermal/S4_capable for > > userland to tell kernel userland component (pm-util or upower?) already > > take the _HOT event and try to do S4. > > > > How do you think about this idea? > > I'm not so sure, this sounds a bit like an ad-hoc interface for a pretty > specific problem. I would expect, it needs more integration than a > global sysfs flag that keeps its state even when no userland process is > taking care anymore. > > The details should probably be discussed on a mailing list like > devkit-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and the people working on the > userspace integration side should comment on it. > It's Kay's suggestion from userland side, do we need discuss with more guys from desktop side? Thank's a lot! Joey Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
