Hi Matthew, On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:21:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03:19PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > ACPI people, > > > > Do you have any objection to the patch below, or can I push it upstream? > > If you pass that boot option, you're already indicating that you don't > care about multiple things accessing the same resources simultaneously. > I think it's reasonable to leave things up to the user to configure at > that point. The asus_atk0110 driver loads automatically. The user doesn't configure anything, and it just loads. That's the problem. If the driver didn't load automatically, I wouldn't care. If you know of any way to prevent the asus_atk0110 driver from auto-loading as soon as acpi_enforce_resouce=lax or =no is passed, I am fine with this as well. This is what I wanted to do originally, but I couldn't find a way to do it, which is why I went for the more radical option of preventing the asus_atk0110 driver from loading. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
