Re: [LKML] Re: swiotlb detection should be memory hotplug aware ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:51:40 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:09:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > , Alok Kataria wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alok,
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Looking at the current code swiotlb is initialized for 64bit kernels
> >> only when the max_pfn value is greater than 4G (MAX_DMA32_PFN value).
> >> So in cases when the initial memory is less than 4GB the kernel boots
> >> without enabling swiotlb, when we hotadd memory to such a kernel and go
> >> beyond the 4G limit, swiotlb is still disabled. As a result when any
> >> 32bit devices start using this newly added memory beyond 4G, the kernel
> >> starts spitting error messages like below or in some cases it causes
> >> kernel panics.
> >
> > Yes seems like a real problem.
> >
> >>
> >> 1. Enable swiotlb for all 64bit kernels which have memory hot-add
> >> support.
> >
> > I don't think that's a good idea. It would enable it everywhere on
> > distributions which compile with hotadd. Need (2)
> >
> >> 2. Instead of checking the max_pfn value in pci_swiotlb_detect, check
> >> for max_hotpluggable_pfn (or some such) value. Though I don't see such a
> >> value readily available. I could parse the SRAT and get hotplug memory
> >> information but that will make swiotlb detection logic a little too
> >> complex. A quick look around srat_xx.c files and the acpi_memhotplug
> >> module didn't find any useful API that could be used directly either.
> >> So was wondering if any of you are aware of an easy way to get such
> >> information ?
> >
> > I have a patchkit to revamp the SRAT parsing to store the hotadd information
> 
> There is a late mechanism to do kickoff the SWIOTLB. Perhaps the hot-add
> could use swiotlb_init_late and start up the SWIOTLB?

I guess that you are talking about
swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size(), which IA64 uses. However, you
can use swiotlb_late_init_with_default_size() only before we
initialize devices. Making it work after initializing devices is not
so easy, I think (that is, we need to change dma_ops).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux