From: Luck, Tony <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Alex Chiang introduced acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() in commit:
ACPI: processor: call _PDC early
78f1699659963fff97975df44db6d5dbe7218e55
But this results in a section mismatch:
WARNING: drivers/acpi/acpi.o(.text+0xa9c1): Section mismatch in reference from the
function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() to the variable .cpuinit.data:processor_idle_dmi_table
The function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() references
the variable __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table.
This is often because acpi_early_processor_set_pdc lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of processor_idle_dmi_table is wrong.
The only caller of acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() is acpi_bus_init() which
is an "__init" function. So the correct fix here is to mark
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() "__init" too.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index 30e4dc0..7d4ee39 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
return AE_OK;
}
-void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
+void __init acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{
/*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
