Hm. I think this is an artifact of the way we're treating WMI right now. The assumption is that the interfaces are defined in namespace by their GUID, whereas in fact they're defined by their ACPI namespace. Can we avoid this by just setting the parent to the ACPI device's corresponding Linux device (if present) and including the WMI device's name in the dev_set_name call? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
