On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > It's too early to come to this sort of conclusion (i.e., that suspend > > and resume react very differently to an asynchronous approach). Unless > > you have some definite _reason_ for thinking that resume will benefit > > more than suspend, you shouldn't try to generalize so much from tests > > on only two systems. > > In fact I have one reason. Namely, the things that drivers do on suspend and > resume are evidently quite different and on these two systems I was able to > test they apparently took different amounts of time to complete. > > The very fact that on both systems resume is substantially longer than suspend, > even if all devices are suspended and resumed synchronously, is quite > interesting. Yes, it is. But it doesn't mean that suspend won't benefit from asynchronicity; it just means that the benefits might not be as large as they are for resume. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
