On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:35:54 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > > > Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully > > I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable > > propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request > > control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is > > supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME. > > Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the > > devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the > > platform anyway, so it won't hurt. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 10 ++-------- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Applied after fixing up conflicts related to dev->is_pcie. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
