On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Because the PCI bridges are not the only case where it matters (I'd say they > are really a corner case). Basically, any two async devices separeted by a > series of sync ones are likely not to be suspended (or resumed) in parallel > with each other, because the parent is usually next to its children in dpm_list. Give a real example that matters. Really. How hard can it be to understand: KISS. Keep It Simple, Stupid. I get really tired of this whole stupid async discussion, because you're overdesigning it. To a first approximation, THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS USB. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
