> > Yes, but what happens if there are two states of type C2? The whole concept > > of "type C<number>" and "state C<number>" was broken from the beginning... > > Sorry. In my mind, there is no two states of ACPI C2. If processor C3 > above are mapped to ACPI C3, so processor C1 is mapped to ACPI C1, > processor C2 is mapped to ACPI C2. > Len Brown, Am I right? > > If I am wrong, I will file another patches for it. This patch handle the ACPI C2 invlidation on some platform. Another patch "acpi c-states: Fix multiply C-states name disturbance" will unify multiply C-states name. -Youquan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
