Do you mean some kernel info that suggests an acpi control method is overridden by users? Thanks, rui -----Original Message----- From: Len Brown [mailto:lenb@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 2:51 PM To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Zhang, Rui; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: support customizing ACPI control methods at runtime On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 06:31:00 Zhang Rui wrote: > > > > Introduce a new debugfs I/F (/sys/kernel/debug/acpi/custom_method) for ACPI, > > which can be used to customize the ACPI control methods at runtime. > Still no kernel tainting on a successful override? > On purpose or unintended? unintended. Rui, please send a follow-on patch to taint, just like when we override the DSDT. thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
