Re: Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> You mean, if A comes before B in the list and A must suspend after B?  

But if they are not topologically ordered, then A wouldn't necessarily be 
before B on the list in the first place.

Of course, if we've mucked with the list by hand and made sure the 
ordering is ok, then that's a different issue. But your whole point seemed 
to be that the device could impose its own ordering in its suspend 
callback, which is not true on its own without external ordering.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux