Re: [PATCH 32/33] input: add KEY_WIRELESS_CYCLE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > That's not what I got from this thread.  What I got was that KEY_WLAN would
> > be overloaded with KEY_RFKILL semanthics, regardless of anything we did in
> > the kernel side.
> 
> No.

Good.

> > And, if what we call KEY_WLAN is actually supposed to be KEY_RFKILL, swap
> > their definitions when adding KEY_RFKILL, so that USB HID devices will
> > generate KEY_RFKILL instead of KEY_WLAN.
> 
> I don't think this is in HID?

I don't think it is.  I wrote that along the lines of "even if that were to
happen, there is a way to fix things properly".

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux