On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A bit more info on this. It seems there's a > CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_OVERRIDE_INITRAMFS in the "normal" SUSE source RPM > package (which in my config is not enabled, but there is an option for > that) and looking at the drivers/acpi/osl.c and the > include/acpi/acpiosxf.h file, there's a define for this in the header > which has acpi_load_override_tables(void); and also this is present in > the osl.c file.... see both attachments. I could not find the same > thing in the kernel-default-vanilla source RPM package also present in > the repo. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ reply: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > You should take this up with the OpenSUSE people, not lkml. Yeah I know, and what I've been planning to. But, I enabled this option some minutes ago and tried to compile again. It passed compilation of osl.c so I think it's all good now. There have been quite a lot of complains about how SUSE configures and splits its kernel packages; for the new 11.2 release, I've read a lot of them on the SUSE forum where people couldn't even boot if the kernel-desktop was selected and installed but had no problems with the kernel-default. I don't know who configures these kernels (I don't use SUSE configured/compiled kernels, only grab them from the build service & configure/compile them myself) but it seems it's getting progressively worse, not to mention in how many different packages they've split the kernel and people are getting confused about this :( Anyways, thanks so far ;) > > Thanks, > ~Randy > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
