On Friday 04 December 2009 10:06:21 am Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:30:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > > I'm only half please with this. You change the function named, but it > > > > doesn't follow the calling convention of acpi_dock_match(), which is a > > > > little confusing. > > > > > > > > Anyway, I will need an ack from the ACPI people before I can pick this > > > > patch. Or maybe they should even push it upstream themselves. > > Len/Bjorn: Any opinion on this ACPI quirk patch to make i2c-scmi work on IBM > systems? I think the i2c-scmi part is in Jean's tree, but I still need this > second patch to the ACPI code itself. Did you pick it up, or should I resend? I'm a little confused as to where we left things. Can you repost the current series in a new thread? It looks like there might be places that use "SMBUSIBM" when they should use ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
