On Monday 16 November 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 17:59:58 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:00:02PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Exactly, but that isn't the same as needing two attributes exported to > > > user space. That is an absolute requirement only if we can't tell what a > > > device's capabilities are. > > > > Right. I don't see any reason for runtime wakeup to be exposed to > > userspace - it's an entirely orthogonal concept to system wakeup. The > > relevant userspace policy is whether or not runtime pm is enabled. > > That brings me to a possibly useless, wild idea. Do we want to tristate > this? Is there any use in a "don't care" setting? I'm not sure what the "don't care" value would be useful for. Besides, I don't really like tristates. :-) Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
