On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o(.text+0x99a): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function acpi_processor_add() to the function
> .cpuinit.text:acpi_processor_power_init()
>
> acpi_processor_add replaced acpi_processor_start which had __cpuinit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index c567b46..ec742a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_cpu_notifier =
> .notifier_call = acpi_cpu_soft_notify,
> };
>
> -static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL;
> int result = 0;
I don't see this patch in today's linux-next ... ACPI guys, are you going
to merge it?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
