On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Quite the system you have there :) What was once 760 lines has been > >> reduced to 24 without removing any information. > >> > >> This seems to be the most we can reduce this particular output since we > >> don't support mapping multiple pxms to a single node. > > > > Yes, thanks very much for the optimization. > > > > (And you can add my Acked-by or whatever you need.) > > Looks also good to me, thanks. Also Acked-by. > Thanks Andi. I'm hoping Ingo will pick this up and not have a problem with the use of NUMA_NO_NODE vs. NID_INVAL since there's a patch pending in -mm that removes the former and this saves a Linus build error when he pushes for 2.6.33 (and they are both defined the same anyway). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html