[David Rientjes - Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:25:51PM -0700]
| On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Mike Travis wrote:
|
...
| +
| +void __init acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping(void)
| +{
| + int i, j;
| +
| + for (i = 0; i < MAX_PXM_DOMAINS; i++) {
| + int nid;
| +
| + nid = pxm_to_node(i);
| + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
Btw, David, while you at it, I just curious -- shouldn't we test it
with NID_INVAL (as pxm_to_node_map initially defined to)? Not a big
deal at all (since they are both = -1) but for the record.
Or perhaps I miss something?
| + continue;
...
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
