On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:43:04 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:17:53PM +0800, Crane Cai wrote:
>
> > This patch below represents my meanings:
> > *) add a new HID for IBM SMBus CMI devices
> > *) add methods for IBM SMBus CMI devices as you did
> > *) hook different HID with different control methods set
> > It may be more smooth for i2c-scmi, please consider.
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> I still need the changes to drivers/acpi/scan.c, but if you push this patch
> upstream then I'll reroll my patch as a follow-on to yours...
>
> > static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_smbus_cmi_ids[] = {
> > - {"SMBUS01", 0},
> > + {"SMBUS01", (kernel_ulong_t)&smbus_methods},
> > + {"SMBUSIBM", (kernel_ulong_t)&ibm_smbus_methods},
>
> ...with the custom HID string #define'd in a header file someplace.
>
> Actually, if you'll add a Signed-off-by line to your patch, I'll submit both of
> them as a patchset and save you a little work. :)
As soon as there is an agreement on how the problem would better be
addressed, I'll be happy to pick the patches.
> > + for (; id->id[0]; id++)
>
> Stylistic nit--would it be clearer to initialize id in the for loop instead of
> at the beginning of the function?
Definitely, yes.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
