On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> > I have never been in favor of merging whitespace-only patches (in a >> > sense that the sole purpose of them being to change whitespaces, but >> > no else value added). >> If somebody tries to send a patch for that file that doesn't fix the >> white-space, checkpatch will complain, and people will complain that >> checkpatch complains, which is precisely what happened, > > Oh, well ... checkpatch warning about this is somewhat controversial. My > preferred way would be that it warns about whitespace only if there are > also some other (non-whitespace) changes. Huh? I think we are talking about different things. See the next comment. >> and I was requested to write this patch by Daniel Walker (final mail >> wasn't on the ml): >> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/14/183 > > This is something slightly different -- he asks you to fixup whitespace > issue in the code you are newly introducing, right? No, did you read the thread? This was my patch: -#define ACPI_MIN(a,b) (((a)<(b))?(a):(b)) -#define ACPI_MAX(a,b) (((a)>(b))?(a):(b)) +#define ACPI_MIN(a,b) min(a, b) +#define ACPI_MAX(a,b) max(a, b) Checkpatch complains, even though my changes are ok. So that's what I mean, if somebody wants to do a similar patch in the future so that checkpatch doesn't complain; they would have to fix the white-spaces again. Or checkpatch should be fixed. >> > And after today's discussion on kernel summit on this topic, I wouldn't >> > expect any maintainer to merge it, sorry :) >> What are you talking about? > > Seems like many kernel maintainers are just tired of > 'whitespace-cleanup-only' patches that bring no real added value > otherwise. Hm, I wonder what would happen to the current badly formatted code. Stay there forever? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html