Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Battery: Add support for _BIX extended info method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> So userspace is supposed to realise that "0" means "this attribute is
> not supported", as opposed to "I am a brand new battery and don't
> remember being factory-tested".
> 
> How about returning -1 for batteries without _BIX?

How about NOT registering attributes that don't exist?  That's the proper
way of doing things in sysfs.

When that's not possible, I'd suggest doing the right thing and returning an
error of some sort (ENXIO, ENOTSUP, etc)...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux