Re: [PATCH] fujitsu-laptop: Fix tests of acpi_evaluate_integer() return

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The wrong test was used acpi_status status is unsigned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> index f35aee5..e3c21ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int get_lcd_level(void)
>  
>  	status =
>  	    acpi_evaluate_integer(fujitsu->acpi_handle, "GBLL", NULL, &state);
> -	if (status < 0)
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return status;
>  
>  	fujitsu->brightness_level = state & 0x0fffffff;
> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static int get_max_brightness(void)
>  
>  	status =
>  	    acpi_evaluate_integer(fujitsu->acpi_handle, "RBLL", NULL, &state);
> -	if (status < 0)
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return status;
>  
>  	fujitsu->max_brightness = state;

Thanks Roel.  Looks perfectly reasonable to me.

Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux