On Saturday 10 October 2009, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:40:45 GMT bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14365 > > > > Summary: resume from suspend to ram broken after suspend to > > disk > > Product: Power Management > > Version: 2.5 > > Kernel Version: 2.6.31 > > Platform: All > > OS/Version: Linux > > Tree: Mainline > > Status: NEW > > Severity: normal > > Priority: P1 > > Component: Hibernation/Suspend > > AssignedTo: power-management_other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ReportedBy: corsac@xxxxxxxxxx > > Regression: No > > It worries me that we have both "Power management, Hibernation/Suspend" > and acpi-power-sleep-wake. > > Are these duplicative? acpi-power-sleep-wake is more specific. Hibernation/Suspend bugs need not be. about ACPI. > Should we kill one off? I don't think that's necessary. > Do the acpi developers monitor the "Power Management" category? Yes, they do, to my knowledge. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
