On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Alex Chiang wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > > > > Fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14129, which is a > > regression from 2.6.30. > > Thanks for doing this. > > One small comment below (not major), but other than that: > > Reviewed-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Danny Feng <dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: chepioq <chepioq@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > > @@ -389,6 +389,18 @@ struct pci_dev *acpi_get_pci_dev(acpi_ha > > > > pbus = pdev->subordinate; > > pci_dev_put(pdev); > > + > > + /* > > + * During resume from a sleep state we can get a dock > > + * notification for a device that is present in ACPI tables, > > + * but not physically accessible at the moment, so tell the > > + * caller it's not present in that case. > > + */ > > + if (!pbus) { > > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Secondary bus not present\n"); > > Should this be dev_dbg() or maybe even strike it completely? I thought about that, but I decided not to just in order to get some idea about how many affected systems are out there. If that happens to be a problem for anyone, we can simply remove the message in the future. > > > + pdev = NULL; > > + break; > > + } > > } > > out: > > list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp, &device_list, node) > > Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
