On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This thing has already been merged, it appears: and it looks like a > total breakage of rules to me. Well, Len pointed out to me that the NAK is kind of pointless, since it had no constructive alternatives to the issue. So he left it in as documentation, but until the scheduler people can actually _do_ something about the problem, their voice doesn't really matter, does it? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
