Hello Rafael, On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [Notes: > > * Here's the first summary report of known regressions from 2.6.31. There's > not too many of them at the moment, which is nice. > > * We're still getting quite a number of reports of regressions from 2.6.30 and > it's been that way since 2.6.31 was released. For details please see the > summary report of regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 that will follow shortly.] > > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there > are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, > please let me know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know > either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the > entries below are invalid. > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to > this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the > issue. > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > ---------------------------------------- > 2009-10-02 22 15 9 > > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299 > Subject : oops in wireless, iwl3945 related? > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > Date : 2009-09-29 17:12 (3 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125424439725743&w=4 > If you add one more entry say "Suspected commit :" then it will be great and will solve regressions much faster. You can request submitter to submit 'suspected commit' by git bisect and also specify git bisect links like : (for more information about git bisect check http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753) Thanks, -- JSR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
